Navajo Nation President Reinstated

For Immediate Release


WINDOW ROCK (December 14, 2009) – Navajo Nation President Joe Shirley, Jr., was returned to authority this evening after a Window Rock District Court judge issued a permanent injunction against the Navajo Nation Council that placed him on administrative leave Oct. 26 – essentially declaring the law the council used null and void.

Following a five-hour evidentiary hearing, District Judge Geraldine Benally ruled that the Navajo Nation Council and Speaker Lawrence T. Morgan acted beyond the scope of their authority when they attempted to place President Shirley on administrative leave, robbed Navajo voters of their chosen leader, and silenced their voice by silencing his. “Because they acted outside the scope of their authority,” said Benjamin C. Runkle, one of the President’s attorneys from Gallagher & Kennedy, “the resolution placing the President on administrative leave was declared by the court to be null and void, and therefore unenforceable as a matter of law.” It is possible the council could appeal the decision but Mr. Runkle said he did not believe the court’s decision will be reversed. “I feel confident in an appeal that the result will be the same,” he said. “By the evidence, the council acted outside its authority and it can’t cloak itself in sovereign immunity where it takes action in violation of the law and the dignity of the executive office.”

President Shirley’s attorneys – Paul K. Charlton, Benjamin C. Runkle and Kiersten A. Murphy of Gallagher & Kennedy Law Offices, and Michelle Dotson of the Office of the President and Vice President – argued that the council did not have the authority to place the President on administrative leave because the statute that it used conflicts with the separation of powers inherent to the three-branch form of government. They said that the council also did not follow procedures under the law in order to enact the resolution. Because of that when it enacted this legislation, it falsely tried to call it “an emergency.” Further, it twice tried to punish the President for his government reform initiatives through legislation. The first attempt was when it tried to legislatively abolish the Office of the First Lady. When the legislation was brought before the Government Services Committee, the committee killed the legislation. The second attempt was when it tried to abolish the President’s Executive Protection Detail but failed to submit it to the Government Services Committee as required by law. “You can here see a clear intent of the Speaker’s office to punish the President with legislation for his policies, to retaliate against him,” Mr. Runkle said. “When a legislature tries to punish somebody outside the court system, they’re acting outside the scope of their authority.” The attorneys also argued that under Navajo traditional and fundamental law, there is a due process right to have allegations against you and the charge be heard. The President should at least have had the opportunity to hear the allegations against him, but did not. “In this case, by using these secret procedures, they effectively robbed the people of their chosen leader when they put him on administrative leave,” Mr. Runkle said. “They silenced his voice and he could no longer speak for those who elected him into office.”

President Shirley expressed his appreciation to the law firm of Gallagher & Kennedy, and to his friend Paul K. Charlton for stepping forward to take the case on his behalf. He said from the moment 48 council delegates acted to place him on leave, he believed they should not have done it, and that they did not do right. “It should never have happened in the way that it has…because there’s really nothing there to base it on,” he said. Nonetheless, he said he has been working throughout the six weeks of leave by visiting chapters to educate the public about the two government reform initiatives. “We hung in there with the issue,” he said. “Now I can continue as President of the Navajo Nation. We’ve been very diligent despite that which has been going on, in trying to put a couple of legislations from the people on the books. And I sincerely believe it’s because we were working on that we’ve been put through what we’ve been put through.”